# \[Approved\] Aurora Latam (September - October) **URL:** \ **Category:** Aurora Community proposals\ **Tags:** proposals, community, latam\ **Created:** [September 14, 2022, 3:39am UTC](https://forum.aurora.dev/t/approved-aurora-latam-september-october/1145 "2022-09-14T03:39:58Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 31
**Author:** ![BacoHorse](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.aurora.dev/bacohorse/32/1028_2.png) [@BacoHorse](https://forum.aurora.dev/u/BacoHorse)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2022, 5:10pm UTC](https://forum.aurora.dev/t/approved-aurora-latam-september-october/1145/31 "2022-09-21T17:10:25Z")
Hello, I’m fine. For everyone’s information, my real name is Julian (NEAR forum User [jblm](https://gov.near.org/u/jblm/summary)) > [@nacho.near](#): > > Of course, no worries, lack of transparency? Here is the detailed breakdown of the budgeting usage: > Twitter Moderation: 300 usd > Twitter Spaces and AMAs: 150 usd each(x4 spaces) 600usd > Telegram Moderation: 300 usd > Interactive Clases (crypto and defi): 500 per teacher monthly (x2 teachers) 1000usd total > leads strategic work connecting and supporting regions: 500 each (x2 leads) 1000usd total > Articles, posts and giveaways engaging with the community: 550 in a variety of activities. Thank you for indicating that, but it was not necessary to ask you for that information. It is logical to include it in [your report for Aug-Sep](https://forum.aurora.dev/t/report-aurora-latam-august-mid-sept/1129) (where there isn’t !) and that is an Aurora Latam failure, so I said for lack of transparency. > [@nacho.near](#): > > Regarding regional support, you mean the support of only Venezuela? I do not mean that, I mean the support of all the communities or regions in Near & Aurora that there is or we are born in Latin America. You say to have a support, but I don’t see it, where is it? However, I don’t like how you come by carrying this, you don’t represent Latam. I love decentralization … Where is Aurora Latam DAO? You look like a benevolent dictator. > [@nacho.near](#): > > And to be frank its quite harassing to be receiving coordinated messages such as this shown in our telegram The important thing about that is that you did not consult me previously if I agreed, if I wanted to have privileges to share links and with all due respect, claim that I had mods privileges on your telegram. I communicated with @Turco, and he clarified that it was only to share links, since no member of that group can do it without permission. It is the usual in the groups, restrict that advantage to Scammers. What is wrong is to grant privileges without consulting before. Have you consulted or discussed anything about your idea rather than impose on others? Please, more professional, do not misrepresent what others say. Mine is not a coordinated attack, it is normal communication. I didn’t want to be a moderator of your Telegram group, I don’t need it. Then I left the group, because I felt uncomfortable with what I read in this forum. > [@nacho.near](#): > > You and Venezuela are not the founders and creators of the proposal for Aurora LATAM, for much that you are hurt by that, that will not change. Its clear that you wanted to take over that spot but we were trusted with that mission first. Please stop the attacks and harassment. We simply proposed it first and then helped other regions to grow and we will keep doing so. It is true that you first proposed it from NEAR Argentina, your Aurora LATAM, as you think. That does not matter to me, the first is not the only one. Here it does not matter to appear or who is the first. Me or my colleagues, we don’t want that. We wanted it to start by consulting and talking with all the Guilds in Latin America, that takes time. You didn’t bother to do it, you were too hasty. We could have gone ahead all united under a justified leadership, but it is not like that. > [@nacho.near](#): > > PS. Oh and next time please instead of creating an alt account just to comment almost solely on our initiatives Now to close. I would have liked to use my NEAR forum user here, which cost me a lot to create activity from Dec 2021. But it can’t, I had to create an alternative account, just like you did in this forum. The difference is that you use the same nickname in both, not everyone does that. That is not a rule, since the Aurora forum is independent from the NEAR forum. My account in this forum is relatively new, I had little time, less than a week of reading, it was not created to comment only on your posts, I created it to contribute to Aurora, build projects and grow a solid regional or Latam community. However, Aurora is NEAR, from where you could have consulted, debated, reached agreements with everyone, taking more time to do it, and then we could be seeing here more support for your idea as a founder, leader or whatever you want to call it. I don’t like the words that are carried away by the wind !!! --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.aurora.dev/t/approved-aurora-latam-september-october/1145)._