# \[Approved\] Aurora LATAM

**URL:** <https://forum.aurora.dev/t/approved-aurora-latam/490>\
**Category:** Aurora Community proposals\
**Tags:** proposals, community, latam\
**Created:** [July 19, 2022, 7:07pm UTC](https://forum.aurora.dev/t/approved-aurora-latam/490 "2022-07-19T19:07:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BacoHorse](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.aurora.dev/bacohorse/32/1028_2.png) [@BacoHorse](https://forum.aurora.dev/u/BacoHorse)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2022, 4:56pm UTC](https://forum.aurora.dev/t/approved-aurora-latam/490/27 "2022-09-17T16:56:29Z")

</div>

Hello everyone  
My name Julian. In the NEAR forum I am known as @jblm. I am an active member of NEAR & Aurora Venezuela and moderator of the Telegram groups.

Let’s read this:

> [@FritzWorm](#):
>
> - **Lack of transparency**
> - **Lack of Regional support**. Plus, Not taking the advice to look for regional support
> - **Personal attacks sharing documents with false statements** (already discussed the problems about Martin Montero against LATAM and you were there and didn’t support but now you do)

Those sentences are completely true. It is said that this proposal was for the purpose of creating an Aurora LATAM Community, but the lack of activity metrics on Telegram or Twitter for other communities in NEAR by country (Venezuela, Mexico, etc), shows that you did not take the bother to consult with them beforehand, and include them in the Proposal of project. That would have been great to see. Why didn’t you show it?

In the end, it is a proposal (Approved!) to make Aurora LATAM centralized in Argentina, which cannot or does not represent Latin America.

> [@FritzWorm](#):
>
> There is no clear budget for the use of the funding

I love the detailed proposals, which tentatively show the use of the funds for each of the items that your put under “How will we get there?”. It is interesting to be able to compare the correspondence between the proposal and the report with respect to the use of funds.

In addition, the [Report](https://forum.aurora.dev/t/report-aurora-latam-august-mid-sept/1129) should not have been a separate post, but here linked to your proposal.

@FritzWorm will not be the only one to rise up to make these observations. I am not active in this forum yet, and only recently, I have been able to understand these things.

My complaint is clear.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.aurora.dev/t/approved-aurora-latam/490)._